After
gas prices started strangling truck sales, the 2008 Malibu was an early
bright spot in Chevrolet’s volume-car lineup. The sedan claimed a spot
on our 10Best list for 2008,
but was not without its shortcomings. Its styling was clean but
unexciting, and the back seat in particular wasn’t as spacious or
comfortable as those in its chief competitors.
Redesigned
for 2013, the Malibu addresses a few of those complaints—and ignores or
even exacerbate others. It’s 2.7 inches wider, but the wheelbase is
significantly shorter—down 4.5 inches—and rear legroom shrinks by 0.8
inch. Measured interior volume is up 2.6 cubic feet, but the reduction
in length means that major gains are in hip- and shoulder room when they
really needed to be made fore and aft. The trunk grows one cubic foot,
from 15 to 16. Front suspension remains a strut-type setup, and the rear
is still a multilink. Variable-assist electronic power steering is
standard on all Malibu models.
Chevy also offers a mild-hybrid Malibu Eco and a turbocharged 2.0-liter
range-topper with 259 hp, but the car tested here packs the base
engine, an all-new naturally aspirated 2.5-liter inline-four. With a
block and head cast from aluminum, dual overhead cams with variable
valve timing, and direct fuel injection, the 2.5 is state of the art.
With 197 hp and 191 lb-ft of torque, it’s also quite potent—that’s more
twist than any other base four in the Malibu’s segment. Better still,
its EPA-estimated fuel economy of 22 mpg in the city and 34 on the
highway betters last year’s weaker (by 28 hp) base motor. All 2013
Malibus get a six-speed automatic transmission.
Warning: Tirade Ahead!
So
the new Malibu’s specs paint a mixed picture. (Less legroom? This is a
class in which space and comfort are of the utmost importance.) In
person, though, our consensus is that it paints a flat-out discordant
picture. Style is an individual preference, so all we’ll say is that
we’re not fans.
|
|
Open the door, though, and you’ll forget all
about the exterior styling. Discretion is not just the better part of
valor, it’s the better part of everything. It enables such enjoyable
phenomena as social drinking and civil disobedience, but you won’t find
discretion in the Malibu’s interior styling. There is an overwhelming
assortment of colors, textures, and finishes inside, and our example’s
optional two-tone leather makes the Malibu’s cabin look like the
equivalent of a Top Chef challenge in which contestants must use
every one of a wild assortment of ingredients—including American cheese.
We counted at least eight different materials/textures—not pieces, mind
you, but different types of material—making up just the front door
panel, and we didn’t even count the little parts. The seats in our car
were black leather with teal stitching, orange-ish-brown
faux-football-look inserts, and piping that was almost the same color as
the football-looking swaths but not quite.
That’s Where All the Restraint Went
Close
your eyes, though, and the Malibu is a nice place to be. The 2.5 is
surprisingly strong and linear—quiet, too, during normal use, although
it drones a bit at high rpm. It yanks the car to 60 mph in 7.7 seconds
and through the quarter-mile in 16.1 at 88 mph. Those figures are dead
even with the best from our two recent mid-size sedan comparos—in one of which
the Malibu Eco finished dead last. While the turbo engine offers 62
more horsepower and 69 lb-ft more torque, the Malibu doesn’t need them.
It’s not a sports sedan, and we’d happily trade the power for better
fuel efficiency. (The EPA rates the 2.5 at 22/34 mpg city/highway; the
turbo at 21/30. Our observed 17 mpg is based on primarily full-throttle
driving.) We don’t recognize rocker switches atop shift levers as an
involving method of manually requesting shifts, but if you do, you’ll be
rewarded with sporty, rev-matched downshifts





0 comments:
Post a Comment